In chronological order, onetwothree! I hope those unbribed injured parties enjoy taking their scandals to the press 8')
And the one (1) question! Now that four missions have been sowing the seeds for chemical weapon reform, is there a need for gears to shift into another sphere to cement actual results, or will those changes emerge on their own after enough public attention is generated?
In other words, are more missions with this indirect format "enough" to get an outcome, or will something different - say, more directly political - be necessary? Just want to get an idea of the desired trajectory.
LOG x3 + QUESTION x1
And the one (1) question! Now that four missions have been sowing the seeds for chemical weapon reform, is there a need for gears to shift into another sphere to cement actual results, or will those changes emerge on their own after enough public attention is generated?
In other words, are more missions with this indirect format "enough" to get an outcome, or will something different - say, more directly political - be necessary? Just want to get an idea of the desired trajectory.